Please visit our new site at http://www.blogintegrity.net/

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

 
Our Integrity Is The MOST Delicious of ALL!

NTodd put in SiteMeter today. And it tells rather an interesting tale: 102,286 visitors since we started up last Thursday. Not bad...

But check this out: the site we're spoofing, Online Integrity, has a grand total of 9,204 visitors since they got started.

Draw your own conclusions, but I for one think this is pretty freaking funny. (It's also intriguing that by far the largest number of OI's recent referrals come from the MyDD post where Chris Bowers said he wouldn't sign up for OI.)




[Update - 5/10] - I just had the cable internets access hooked up. So now, we're not only the most deliciously integrific, we're the most fastest integritizers who ever made integrity a word between... ohhh.. insult and intellectual... Rip -

Comments:
I noticed the Pentagon was at my place today, via BI.

Say... NTodd wouldn't have started BI at 100k on sitemeter, would he?

Nahhhh... that's crazy talk...
 
Say... NTodd wouldn't have started BI at 100k on sitemeter, would he?

RIPLEY! For shame. NTodd has Quakertegrity, as he explained below, in terms that were awfully eloquent, if whiny.

Besides, I don't think he knows how to do it. Not without pants, anyway.
 
RIPLEY! For shame. NTodd has Quakertegrity,

NTodd *sez* he has Quakertegrity...but since he refuses to sign the pledge we don't really know what kind of egritys he may be in possesion of, now do we?



Wonder how many of your repeat visits have come thru the Tacky site?
 
RIPLEY! For shame. NTodd has Quakertegrity

Oh, Reginald! I disagree!!

(I think we should adopt that as the tagline for this site - civil discourse, and all that rot...)
 
"Civil discourse, and all that rot..."

hee hee.
 
Thou who art doubting mine Quakertegrity shalt burn in the fires of hell for thine doubtitude. Yea, verily.

[cocks black hat menacingly, though with just a touch of integrity]

jnfcca!
 
¿How many of those heets came through the first post of the beeg "A"?

¿y tambie, why do joo no have a leenk to here from metacomments, eh? I could geeve all the sites on Monte Liberalista better click-lovin' eef I could get to them all from the same place, no?

so.
 
So I could have done this and still remained an integrious goddess? Damn!
 
EGN, there is no link from Metacomments because I am lazy.

Hey, send me an email and I'll enable you as a member of this blog, if you like. AHAGGERT99@yahoo.com You'd add a feline perspective that has been heretofore missing.
 
check this out: the site we're spoofing

Wait a Quaker Pickin' Second: we're spoofing somebody? Jumpin' Jesus in a box of oatmeal! I cannot participate in such things. It's againt my logos. My ethos. My pathos.

No, wait, I'm not Catholic. Nevermind.

I shit on all of you. And laugh because my Inner Light told me to. Now where da white wimmin at?
 
Now where da white wimmin at?

Vermont.
 
Just for the record I didn't request hookers, I merely asked when they might be expected. It was, in my understanding, part of the pledge, along with the fried matzoh every other Thursday.

And, as far as bloggers comment section, all I have to say is xqwzfsky, although that may change the next time.

-- Stu
 
Thou who art doubting mine Quakertegrity shalt burn in the fires of hell for thine doubtitude. Yea, verily.

That was fairly pulsating with incivility.

Forsooth, thou demonstateth thine lack of egrity.
 
102,286 visitors since we started up last Thursday

I feel the pulsing proximity of a digital mob guilelessly flexing its muscle and emanating raw hatred.

Could just be all the feckin' HOOKERS.
 
¡Apestoso Perros del Inferno!

I have just read the MyDD thread weeth Bowers arguing against the wankerrr Trevino.

Now, I comprende the good that ees blogintegrityblogspotcom.blogspot.com.

¡Vamanos!

so.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?